"Sinology" is hosted by the Beijing Foreign Studies University research center of Overseas Sinology, a comprehensive academic journal edited by Mr. Ren Jiyu. The aim is to introduce Sinology research in domestic academic circles all over the world history, achievements and the latest progress, to broaden the research Chinese traditional culture. At the same time, and actively promote the study of extraterritorial Sinology in domestic academic circles, efforts to promote the domestic academic circles and overseas Sinologist dialogue, make "Sinology" and "Ancient Chinese Literature Search" launched a benign interaction, in the comparative study of a cross culture, promote Sinology Research level. This book includes:. A word, Sinologist page, Sinologist interview, missionaries study, history of Sino Western cultural exchange, Chinese religious thought research.
An introduction to the study of Sinology Sinology - Jia Yan Wei Li Xian - missionary Sinologist page, translator and cultural interpretation of the French Sinologist Chavannes academician Alexeyev and Sinology school Sinologist interview interview with Professor Busty input the missionaries carried out research on Qing Dynasty strengthened international cooperation in Qing Dynasty into China Missionary literature collection and sorting some ideas about "complete works" volume third Martini "Atlas" new Chinese illustrated history of Chinese and Western cultural communication about the culture of the West in the first substantive contact -- an interview with Professor Xie Henai all over the world: Confucianism - "model in the dialogue into the Hebei University and cultural exchanges between the East and the West in the basic library catalog Jane book what Dahua -- a Jesus will be forgotten by history historian Jonathan Spence Chinese historical research China religious thoughts of Buddhism and two-way thought origin Wilde right Taoism and identity of Fu Shengze for" Christian history moral "and other Chinese ancient classic history of Western history of Christian China Christian China of modern Chinese trend -- to America and Taiwan area As the research cases abroad about the modern Xinjiang Christianity history research Chinese language mastering key Chinese characteristics "of the Ming and Qing Dynasties -- foreign Chinese textbooks Xue Haihua" Devin version of the translator sequence on Granet "the book of songs. Study on the gains and losses on Cao Zhi 'seven sorrows. And Jin Le version -- and to Jie Ni ask Mr. Feng Zhi Centennial memorial of Feng Zhi and Gerd's "Faust" -- from a non 斯托非勒斯 to Helen Karl Jaspers and the poet Feng Zhi Sinology institutions to the French national of Oriental Languages and culture and the Department of Chinese price and Book Review "Asia Europe first, create" preface to the two or three volume of precious Sino Russian relations archives annex "International Sinology" Twelfth series English directory "Sinology" afterword "of the first World Chinese Conference" notice "China held something close to" international seminar notice German Sinology International Conference on invitation
Chandler: in fact, Leigh this "Confucianism" or "fill the Confucianism", "harmony", "compromise" cultural strategy, the intellectual elite has open mind at the time such as Xu Guangqi, Li Zhizao has been actively sincere response. A naturalized citizen Leigh and the Christian civilization (specifically the recipient) in the interpretation of Confucian classics, especially the interpretation of "Confucian works day" and "God" and Dieu, "reached based on misunderstandings." (see the original page 100th), even the "conspiracy", thus sowing up to a century of "etiquette" for the seed (see the original page 59). Whether this "between Leigh and Chinese literati misunderstanding" and "tacit understanding" is interested in (see the original page 51), but it is an objective fact, how do you evaluate it? In particular this misconception has reached a tacit "tacit understanding", or even "conspiracy", how do you know it? When the "misunderstanding" is the two can't avoid different cultural exchange in the cognitive phenomenon, it should be given a kind of cultural connotation? Xie: today Chinese some people think, welcome the Christian Scholar and official than those who accuse it of people for more enlightened. This is a must carefully study the complex issues. We should distinguish clearly, in the "西士" preaching, China elite eyes religious things and technology and science is new. Imported goods in order to be able to be understood and accepted, will have to conform to the general characteristics of the times and the class. Give a technical example, missionaries to Chinese know screw since antiquity in use in europe. The new device has not been accepted, or because it does not meet the need, or because it does not adapt to which contains no Europeans know drive belt and the crank Chinese whole technique system. In mathematics and astronomy calculation, if the system was accepted, then the theory for China tradition, rather strange that cannot accept, such as "elements" (the first six chapters by Limado interpretation, translation of Xu Guangqi) is so. Xu Guangqi has long been the Ricci taught, he could understand the abstract reasoning, but China mathematicians used to use graphics and digital, in their own way to explain this book. They think the book talk downright nonsense and eager to get rid of those nonsense. There are undeniable impact of the book, but after the first edition is indirect: it encourages Chinese to regain their ancient tradition in mathematics, and improved in some aspects. So China mathematical tradition can be passed to nineteenth Century. Similarly, when we study Limado's works "God", can find a series of abstract argument is completely different from the traditional (Aristotle Chinese from four factors, three types of soul, the connotation of the three forms of identities, the seven forms of...). These have in the 11-14 century medieval scholastic debates using arguments teaching in sixteenth Century school again, in order to logical argument to a set against the pagan idea to equip future missionaries, and as a Christian truth proof. Limado is trying to counter what he couldn't understand Chinese traditional (yin and Yang, Tai Chi, goodness...) And the Buddhist concept of the fallacy (karma, life and death, not to kill...) The. The scholastic theory at that time was the will to develop from Galileo to Newton's classical science scholars rejected. I don't want to be too complicated to explain here. However, in Chinese this scholastic theory is consideredIs too contrived.......
Culture @ 2017